Playtest 1 (first two pushes, ~40 min game time — pacing on target) found the railgun_s-spam-cruiser meta and confirmed the repair tool as overpowered (second signal after the persistent arena escort margin): - repair_tool 9 -> 4 HP/s: the arena only prices in-fight sustain; real runs add free between-wave top-offs across the whole swarm - railgun_l range 100 -> 130: now outranges stations (120), buying the siege role the capital ladder promises - railgun_m 14 -> 16 dmg, range 70 -> 80: concentration tax softened so the ladder reads "pay some DPS efficiency for reach", not "strictly worse" - new tracked arena: railgun_s-spam cruisers vs default cruisers Module costs untouched, so all threat values stay valid. Docs updated (derived.md, history.md playtest record, README status). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DyCu8vwChKMbLJQ3xosYEN
128 lines
6.9 KiB
Markdown
128 lines
6.9 KiB
Markdown
# Balancing History
|
||
|
||
Chronological record of the balancing work: what was decided, what was
|
||
found, what changed. Current values live in `derived.md`; this file
|
||
explains how they got there.
|
||
|
||
## 2026-07-02/03 — rules and structural decisions
|
||
|
||
- Rules document written (now `rules.md`): ratio curve, shortcut
|
||
recipes, refactorability, cost archetypes, threat model, growth curve.
|
||
- Scrap derived from threat (`scrap_per_threat`), replacing authored
|
||
per-ship scrap drops; scrap threat became the constant
|
||
`1/scrap_per_threat`, removing the old min-scrap_drop derivation and
|
||
its circularity.
|
||
- Duplicate schematic drops removed (no level-ups); ship/module levels
|
||
removed entirely — all time scaling lives in the threat rate, push
|
||
scaling stays on stations. Mk2 upgrade recipes noted as the future
|
||
per-item progression.
|
||
- Growth-curve rules added: escalating expansion costs, designed
|
||
doubling time, growth limited by economy not waiting; resource
|
||
deposits designed (deposit-gated mid resource in expansion territory).
|
||
- Production tree v2 decided: iron/copper everywhere (M-type asteroid),
|
||
quartz in geodes (mid), voidsteel battle-forged from scrap (late);
|
||
titanium dropped; lasers renamed to railguns, lasers reserved as a
|
||
future weapon type.
|
||
|
||
## 2026-07-03 — targets, tree, numbers
|
||
|
||
- Balancing targets fixed: ≤2 h run, phases 1–5/6–14/15+, factory curve
|
||
25/60/120/150, threat ladder, 25-ship swarm, block roots.
|
||
- Tree structure drafted and numbers computed (recursive threat
|
||
calculator); ratio curve realized; fitted ships within 96–124% of the
|
||
strawman ladder (small end hot from fixed chain overhead — ladder
|
||
later adopted the achieved values).
|
||
- **Rule bugs found by the numbers work:** the scrap→ingot smelter
|
||
recipe would inflate basic materials via the max rule (fixed:
|
||
scrap-consuming recipes are threat fallback only); recipe output
|
||
amounts were ignored (fixed: per-unit division); items downstream of
|
||
reprocessing-only items never resolved (fixed: fixpoint resolution);
|
||
a shortcut recipe resolving earlier than the base path silently
|
||
underpriced items (fixed: commit only when all eligible recipes are
|
||
computable). All four fixed in `ThreatCostCalculator` with tests, and
|
||
implemented in `tools/threat_report.py`.
|
||
- v2 tree written into the configs; `default_modules` loadouts
|
||
geometry-validated (the numbers-pass loadouts for battlecruiser and
|
||
dreadnought were geometrically impossible — L-modifiers don't fit
|
||
beside full gun complements; corrected loadouts landed closer to the
|
||
ladder).
|
||
|
||
## 2026-07-04 — combat stats, arena rounds 1–5
|
||
|
||
Initial stats derived from the anchors (weapon DPS ≈0.6/threat flat,
|
||
hull 15 HP/threat, armor 20/threat, repair 2 HP/s/threat, station
|
||
range 200).
|
||
|
||
- **Round 1:** concentrated fleets won all equal-threat cross-tier
|
||
matchups flawlessly; glass beat armored; repair escort flawless; two
|
||
stations shrugged off a 3× swarm. Changes: concentration tax on m/l
|
||
gun damage (railgun_m 17→14, railgun_l 70→52), armor 640→1000,
|
||
repair 25→12, station range 200→120. (Team-1 "bias" in mirrors later
|
||
shown to be noise.)
|
||
- **Round 2 (EHP-margin logging added):** battleship +33% while
|
||
dreadnought −37% (stabilizer range + opposing armor); glass still
|
||
+11%. Changes: stabilizer range ×1.5→×1.3; per-hull trims introduced
|
||
(BC 2700→2500, BS 7500→7000, DN/CV 15500→19000).
|
||
- **Round 3 (narrow lanes — geometry fixed into the fixture):**
|
||
DN closed to −11%, BS +22%, swarm flipped to +14% over cruisers,
|
||
glass +12% third time. Changes: armor 1000→1200, BC 2500→2000,
|
||
BS 7000→6300, DN/CV 19000→22500.
|
||
- **Round 4:** glass-vs-armored resolved (+3% armored); noise floor
|
||
established (~±10%/run: BS ignored a −10% EHP cut; repair drifted
|
||
14→24% untouched). Convergence policy adopted: two-round signals only,
|
||
±20% converged. Changes: BC 2000→2200, DN/CV 22500→24000; BS +23%
|
||
accepted as doctrine texture (mechanical range edge vs. pure small
|
||
fleets).
|
||
- **Round 5 (durations logged; end-condition bug fixed upstream):**
|
||
TTK anchor validated (mirrors 23/71/95 s; DN-vs-swarm 214 s outlier
|
||
accepted); dreadnought +3%, everything else inside band. Final
|
||
changes: BC 2200→2400, repair 12→9 (persistent +24% escort margin).
|
||
**Combat pass declared converged.**
|
||
|
||
## 2026-07-05/06 — pacing pass
|
||
|
||
- Unlock ladder set (starting set drone/frigate/railgun_s/salvager;
|
||
quartz gate at level 2; capitals at 8–9 with `unlock_requires`
|
||
chains); threat rate `2*x + 0.15*x*x`; starting blocks 1000→200;
|
||
expansion 400 flat pending the cost formula; artifacts 3→5.
|
||
- **Bug found:** the building_block recipe was silently locked at game
|
||
start (building blocks appear in no schematic's materials, so implicit
|
||
unlocking could never reach the recipe) — fixed with an explicit
|
||
`unlock_at_station_level = -1`.
|
||
- Expansion cost formula implemented and set (`300 + 50*x + 10*x*x`):
|
||
quadratic, so costs outrun the roughly linear block income gradually
|
||
— ~1 expansion per cycle mid-game, 2–3 cycles apart late.
|
||
- **First full balancing round complete.** Next: full-game playtests
|
||
against the run-shape targets.
|
||
|
||
## 2026-07-06 — playtest 1 (first two pushes)
|
||
|
||
First real run: two enemy stations destroyed in ~40 min game time
|
||
(~80 min real time with heavy build-pausing) — roughly on pace for the
|
||
≤2 h game-time target, so pacing untouched.
|
||
|
||
- **Meta finding: cruisers filled with 12× railgun_s dominate.** Predicted
|
||
by the numbers in hindsight: the concentration tax makes railgun_s the
|
||
best DPS/threat (0.62 vs m 0.48, l 0.41), range is the big guns' only
|
||
mechanical edge (armor is added HP, not damage reduction — no anti-swarm
|
||
mechanic), repair sustain covers the closing distance, and stations
|
||
outranged every ship gun (120 vs railgun_l's 100), so even capitals had
|
||
to tank-and-brawl. The cruiser compounds it: first hull with a large
|
||
1×1 canvas (12 cells) and a nearly quartz-free chain.
|
||
- **Repair tool confirmed overpowered** (second signal after the
|
||
persistent +24% arena escort margin): the arena only prices in-fight
|
||
sustain; real runs add free full top-offs in every 15–45 s wave gap
|
||
across the whole swarm. The 0.7 HP/s-per-threat prior is wrong for
|
||
wave defence.
|
||
- **Changes:** repair_tool 9→4 HP/s; railgun_l range 100→130 (now
|
||
outranges stations — buys the siege role the capital ladder promises);
|
||
railgun_m 14→16 dmg and range 70→80 (tax softened: m sits at 0.55
|
||
DPS/threat, between s and l). Module threats unchanged (costs
|
||
untouched), so no ladder recalculation needed.
|
||
- New tracked arena added: railgun_s-spam cruisers (8× 178) vs default
|
||
cruisers (6× 233.5) — the spam side should win a brawl somewhat, but a
|
||
blowout means the small-gun premium needs retuning.
|
||
- **Open:** re-run the arena suite to check the range/damage changes
|
||
against the round 1–5 results; next playtest should verify big guns now
|
||
feel worth climbing to and repair is merely good.
|