Files
dota_factory/docs/content_design.md
2026-06-14 14:06:12 +02:00

195 lines
7.8 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Content Design — Ships & Modules
First real-content iterations (June 2026). Pass 1 defined ship hull grids and
module surface masks; pass 2 defined the production tree (recipes). Stats and
threat costs in the config files are still placeholders for the balancing
pass.
## Design principle: footprint gating
Which module fits on which hull is controlled purely by geometry — no
explicit allow-lists. Each hull grid is shaped so that it physically cannot
contain the footprint of modules from a larger size class. This keeps the
rules transparent to the player ("it doesn't fit because there is no room")
and makes them trivially moddable through the config files alone.
### Module footprint ladder
| Footprint | Modules | Smallest hull that fits it |
|-----------|---------|----------------------------|
| 1x1 | laser_cannon_s, salvager, repair_tool | drone |
| 1x2 | maneuvering_thrusters, sensor_booster, armor_plates | frigate |
| 1x3 | afterburner | frigate (eats most of it) |
| L-shape (3 cells) | weapon_stabilizer, weapon_primer, weapon_upgrade | frigate |
| 2x2 | laser_cannon_m, drone_bay | cruiser |
| 3x3 | laser_cannon_l | battleship |
| 2x6 | drone_hangar | carrier (only) |
### Hull grids
`O` = buildable cell, `X` = hull structure (not buildable).
**drone (xs, 1 cell)** — exactly one 1x1 module: a small gun, a salvager, or
a repair tool. This is what makes drone roles swappable.
O
**frigate (s, 5 cells)** — plus shape. Every 1x2 placement crosses the center
cell, so at most ONE 1x2 support fits; alternatively one L-shaped weapon
modifier or one afterburner through the center line. Gun-boat with one or two
support modules, as intended.
XOX
OOO
XOX
**destroyer (s, 8 cells)** — gun deck with three turret bumps. More cells
than the frigate (more small guns), but still no 2x2 area anywhere, so medium
hardware can never be mounted.
OXOXO
OOOOO
**cruiser (m, 12 cells)** — notched corners. Fits at most two 2x2 m guns
(stacked through the middle), leaving the side cells for supports. No 3x3
area.
XOOX
OOOO
OOOO
XOOX
**battlecruiser (m, 16 cells)** — split bow with two gun cheeks, tapered
stern. Fits three 2x2 m guns — one more than the cruiser — with small support
slots left over. The bow split and stern taper prevent any 3x3 area (no l
gun) and any 2x6 area (no drone hangar).
OOXXOO
OOOOOO
XOOOOX
XXOOXX
**battleship (l, 24 cells)** — broadside hull with notched flanks on every
other row. Fits four 2x2 m guns (two per gun deck) — one more than the
battlecruiser — with bow, stern, and flank cells for supports. All 3x3
placements crowd the center columns, so at most ONE l gun fits: mounted
center it blocks every m gun mount (pure support strips remain), mounted
offset it still allows two m guns. The notched rows are never adjacent-and-
full, so no 2x6 drone hangar fits.
XOOOOX
OOOOOO
XOOOOX
OOOOOO
XOOOOX
**dreadnought (xl, 36 cells)** — the main battery deck is split into three
3x3 gun slots by structural spacer columns, so exactly three l guns fit side
by side (or m guns / supports in unused slots), plus bow/stern strips for
supports. The spacers cap every horizontal run at 5 cells, so the 2x6 drone
hangar can never fit — the carrier stays the only hangar hull.
XXXOOOOOXXX
OOOXOOOXOOO
OOOXOOOXOOO
OOOXOOOXOOO
XXOOXXXOOXX
**carrier (xl, 37 cells)** — the top flight deck (rows 01) is the only
region wide enough for the 2x6 drone hangar, and exactly one fits. The middle
deck row is broken up by elevator shafts (X cells placed so every 3-column
window hits one), which is what prevents any 3x3 l gun from ever fitting.
Lower decks hold supports and 2x2 point-defense m guns.
XOOOOOOOOX
OOOOOOOOOO
OOXOOXOOXO
XOOOOOOOOX
XXXOOOOXXX
### Verified gating matrix
Checked programmatically against the configs (all four mask rotations,
all placements) with `tools/verify_layouts.py` — re-run it after editing
layout grids or surface masks:
python dota_factory/tools/verify_layouts.py
| Footprint | drone | frigate | destroyer | cruiser | battlecruiser | battleship | dreadnought | carrier |
|-----------|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:|
| 1x1 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| 1x2 | | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| 1x3 | | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| L-shape | | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| 2x2 | | | | x | x | x | x | x |
| 3x3 | | | | | | x | x | |
| 2x6 | | | | | | | | x |
Maximum simultaneous (disjoint) placements: m guns — cruiser 2,
battlecruiser 3, battleship 4; l guns — battleship 1, dreadnought 3;
drone hangar — carrier 1.
## Production tree
Design principle: each game phase adds exactly one new base input chain, so
factory complexity ramps alongside ship size.
| Phase | New input | How acquired | Unlocks |
|-------|-----------|--------------|---------|
| early | iron_ore, copper_ore | mined | drone, frigate, destroyer; small guns and basic supports |
| mid | titanium_ore | mined (3x slower than iron) | cruiser, battlecruiser; m guns, drone bay, weapon modifiers |
| late | advanced_alloy | ONLY from reprocessing salvaged scrap | battleship, dreadnought, carrier; l guns, drone hangar |
The advanced_alloy gate is the core loop hook: capital ship production
requires fighting (salvaging scrap from kills and reprocessing it), not just
mining. The reprocessing plant turns 5 scrap into iron/copper/titanium ingots
or advanced_alloy probabilistically.
Intermediate components, by tier:
- **Tier 2 (early):** copper_wire (copper), steel_plate (iron), circuit_board
(iron + wire), building_block (iron).
- **Tier 3 (mid):** mechanical_parts (steel + iron), targeting_unit (circuits
+ wire), drive_unit (steel + mechanical_parts + circuit), titanium_frame
(titanium + steel).
- **Tier 4 (late):** reinforced_plating (steel + advanced_alloy),
capital_core (targeting_unit + drive_unit + 2 advanced_alloy).
Hulls and modules consume intermediates of their tier: early items are built
from tier-2 parts, midgame items require tier-3 parts (deeper chains, more
assemblers), capital items require tier-4 parts (and therefore combat). Hull
items are named `<ship>_hull`; module items `<module>_module`. Every item has
an `[items.*]` entry in visuals.toml; hull item outlines match the ship's
fleet color from `[ships.*]`.
Consistency is checked by `tools/verify_recipes.py` — re-run it after editing
recipes, ship/module materials, or visuals:
python dota_factory/tools/verify_recipes.py
It verifies every consumed item has a producer, every item has a visuals
entry, flags orphaned items, and prints which items are reprocessing-only
(currently exactly advanced_alloy).
## Deliberate placeholders / open questions for later passes
- All new hulls have `threat.cost_formula = "0"` so enemy waves do not spawn
them yet (WaveSystem treats any ship with positive threat cost as wave-
eligible, regardless of unlock level). The balancing pass should set real
threat costs together with `default_modules` loadouts so waves spawn them
armed.
- All new hulls and all assembler recipes are `unlock_at_station_level = -1`
(available from the start) to make testing easy; the balancing pass should
stagger these so mid/lategame recipes drop as schematics from enemy defence
stations.
- Recipe quantities and durations are a first guess, deliberately roughly
tiered (capital hulls ~60 s, drones 4 s); the balancing pass tunes them.
- `drone_bay` and `drone_hangar` are footprint-only placeholders: the drone
launching capability does not exist in the simulation yet, so they define
no capability section.
- Renames in this pass: `laser_cannon_xs``laser_cannon_s` (the old 2x2
`laser_cannon_s` became `laser_cannon_m`), `armor_plate``armor_plates`,
`manuvering_thrusters``maneuvering_thrusters` (typo fix). Test data
under `bin/test/data/config` intentionally still uses the old ids — it is
an independent fixture set.