Use std::optional instead of sentinel values for absent data

This commit is contained in:
2026-07-20 20:27:20 +02:00
parent 1cdafb7bcd
commit 9622fa4345
32 changed files with 228 additions and 209 deletions

View File

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ TEST_CASE("apply(PlaceBuildingCommand) with recipe matches place-then-setRecipe"
viaCommand.apply(command);
const BuildingId id =
SimulationTestAccess::place(viaDirect, BuildingType::Miner, QPoint(-2, 0), Rotation::East);
SimulationTestAccess::place(viaDirect, BuildingType::Miner, QPoint(-2, 0), Rotation::East).value();
SimulationTestAccess::buildings(viaDirect).setRecipe(id, "mine_iron_ore");
REQUIRE(viaCommand.computeStateChecksum() == viaDirect.computeStateChecksum());
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ TEST_CASE("apply(DemolishCommand) matches direct demolish", "[command]")
Simulation viaDirect(loadConfig(), 99);
const BuildingId idA =
SimulationTestAccess::place(viaCommand, BuildingType::Miner, QPoint(-3, 0), Rotation::East);
SimulationTestAccess::place(viaCommand, BuildingType::Miner, QPoint(-3, 0), Rotation::East).value();
const BuildingId idB =
SimulationTestAccess::place(viaDirect, BuildingType::Miner, QPoint(-3, 0), Rotation::East);
SimulationTestAccess::place(viaDirect, BuildingType::Miner, QPoint(-3, 0), Rotation::East).value();
REQUIRE(idA == idB);
DemolishCommand command;